Conebeam vs. Spiral CT: The Clinical Decision Behind the Technology
Why the right CT system depends on how you actually use it, not what the specs sheet says.
The Confusion
You're shopping for CT. Two vendors show up with compelling pitches. Vendor A claims their conebeam system is fast, uses less radiation, and requires minimal shielding. Vendor B argues their spiral CT delivers superior image quality for abdominal and orthopedic work. Both sound right. Both claim clinical advantages. How do you know which one actually serves your practice? The honest answer is that it depends on what you're actually scanning.
Understanding the Technologies
These machines operate on fundamentally different principles. Understanding these operational differences is key to your long-term success.
The Real Question: What Are You Scanning?
This is where vendor neutrality matters. Conebeam makes sense if your primary use case is dental imaging and your secondary use is ENT anatomy. Spiral CT makes sense if you are imaging abdomens, orthopedic trauma, or the thorax, and you need confidence that your radiologist can read the scans without disclaimers.
Three Critical Considerations
Who Will Read Your Scans?
Not all radiologists are comfortable with conebeam CT outside dental and ENT. Many include disclaimers in their report regarding artifacts and contrast resolution. Talk to your radiologist before you buy to eliminate months of buyer's remorse.
Contrast Dosing: The Hidden Cost
If you plan to use IV contrast, conebeam CT requires twice the dose of spiral CT to achieve adequate image signal. This doubles the kidney load, which is a major concern for older patients or those with pre-existing renal compromise.
Service and Long-Term Viability
Many conebeam systems are recycled human equipment. Ask the vendor when the manufacturer discontinues parts production and ensure that technicians/ service engineers exist within a reasonable travel distance of your facility.
Machine Setup and Protocol Design: The Human Element
A CT system requires someone to design scanning protocols: which anatomical regions to image, what reconstruction algorithms to use, and how to balance radiation dose against image quality. This is typically a veterinary technologist or veterinary radiologist with CT experience.
A well-designed protocol can make a mediocre system deliver diagnostically useful images, while a poorly designed protocol can handicap an excellent system. Your technologist's experience directly impacts whether your imaging program succeeds or becomes a source of frustration.
The Questions to Ask:
- Who develops your CT protocols? Is it a board-certified veterinary radiologist or a senior technologist?
- Will your radiologist review and refine protocols before clinical use?
- Does your technologist have experience with both conebeam and spiral systems?
- What is the learning curve for your team, and what support does the vendor provide during optimization?
The Decision Framework
Before you decide, answer these questions:
- What percentage of your imaging will be dental? Over 70 percent suggests a conebeam candidate.
- What percentage will be abdominal or orthopedic? Under 30 percent means you should stick with spiral.
- What does your radiologist actually prefer? This is non-negotiable.
- What is the 10-year service and parts outlook?
The Outcome
Getting the CT decision right means your practice delivers diagnostic-quality images that specialists trust and avoids capital locked into a system that underperforms for your actual clinical needs.
Acquire with Absolute Certainty
If you are evaluating CT systems and want to talk through the clinical and technical tradeoffs specific to your practice, we are here to help.
Request Clinical Guidance